<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>SmashTech &#187; network</title>
	<atom:link href="http://smashtech.net/tag/network/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://smashtech.net</link>
	<description>Did you buy a harmonica?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2012 23:09:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Ethernet Would be a Failure</title>
		<link>http://smashtech.net/2007/06/13/ethernet-would-be-a-failure/</link>
		<comments>http://smashtech.net/2007/06/13/ethernet-would-be-a-failure/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 14:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Olding</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wrong]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smashtech.net/wordpress/2007/06/13/ethernet-would-be-a-failure/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[March, 1974. This new &#8216;ethernet&#8217; idea would never work.  With its concept of variably sized packets and random backoff timings, it would be too unpredictable to deliver any reliable amount of bandwidth.  Well, they say hindsight is 20/20, as this Xerox memo in 1974 shows. &#8220;Your transmission medium or environment is not quantum noise limited. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://smashtech.net/2007/06/13/ethernet-would-be-a-failure/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

